What will be true of OpenAI’s open-weight model?
24
Ṁ3822
Dec 31
17%
released in September, October, November, or December 2025
70%
released in the month of August 2025
13%
released in the month of July 2025
3%
released in the month of June 2025
96%
Is a reasoning model
6%
Is at least an Image-Language Model (ala JanusPro or 4o)
86%
Is at least a Vision-Language Model (ala PaliGemma)
73%
Uses Beyer Teacher/Student distillation ala Gemma 3
13%
my friend @soaffine (who knows ab ai) thinks it unveils an impressive new architecture
86%
An instruct model is made accessible
15%
A base model is made accessible
19%
The model is accessible to all users on the main chatgpt site
20%
Gets 1400+ Elo on lmarena.ai
14%
At least 300B parameters
24%
At least 70B parameters
30%
At least 30B parameters
83%
better than o3-mini on FrontierMath (with tools)
74%
Uses Mixture of Experts
67%
MIT or Apache license

Context:

Feel free to add your own answers. If an answer is unclear you are welcome to ask for clarification from both me and the person who submitted the answer.

Get Ṁ1,000 play money
Sort by:

"reasoning model" will be judged with reference to OpenAI documentation.

bought Ṁ10 Is at least an Image... YES

What’s the difference between image/language and vision/language?

bought Ṁ10 Is at least an Image... NO

@KJW_01294 I think image/language generates images whereas vision/language only takes them as input

I've chosen to bet on the market that references me, but assert that I will be truthful in my evaluation of it. To help others, I would have said no to Gemma 2/3, yes to PaliGemma, yes to DeepSeek-MoE, but no to DeepSeek V3 and DeepSeek R1

bought Ṁ10 MIT or Apache license YES

"parameters" means total parameters?

bought Ṁ30 Uses Mixture of Experts NO

@JoshYou correct