How many people died in the al-Ahli Hospital explosion (Arabic Wikipedia, 2023-11-17)
Mini
13
แน€1404
resolved Nov 18
100%96%
451+
0.3%
0-50
0.7%
51-150
1.6%
151-300
1.4%
301-450

Resolution will be based on the Arabic Wikipedia article for the event, which is currently this one.

Will resolve early if there is a clear and consistent answer before close. Resolution ignores Wikipedia vandalism, as defined by my judgement.

If the article lists a range, I will take the arithmetic mean of that range. If the article lists multiple numbers with equal prominence, I will take the arithmetic mean of those numbers. If the number is being actively updated, I will do my best to take the most recent non-vandalism-number as of close time, but may end up having to exercise some judgment or take an average if it's truly a mess.

As of question writing, the infobox lists two equally prominent numbers: "500+" and "471". I would take the mean of those and resolve based on 485.5 (resolves to "451+").

I will not trade in this market.

This is intended to mirror these markets:
/EvanDaniel/how-many-people-died-in-the-alahli

/chrisjbillington/will-the-arabic-wikipedia-continue

Close date and methodology will be the same as the former question. The reference article will be the same as the latter. I will by default is the automatic Google translation of the article, as I do not speak Arabic. Assistance and feedback on that translation is welcome.

Get แน€1,000 play money

๐Ÿ… Top traders

#NameTotal profit
1แน€86
2แน€57
3แน€45
4แน€16
5แน€7
Sort by:

I believe the infobox is the most prominent estimate, and it gives equal prominence to "471" and "500+". That resolves as (471+500)/2 = 485.5, which is the answer of "451+". This has been stable for a while now.

If there's a strong argument for a different resolution, please post it now. Otherwise I'll resolve accordingly very shortly.

Wow. The difference between the Arabic and English articles is huge. It's like they live in alternate universes.

@Shump The Arabic wiki talk page is an interesting read.