Will AI predict the next magnitude 7+ earthquake to hit San Francisco before it happens?
9
Ṁ280
2046
21%
chance

Resolution criteria

This market resolves to "Yes" if an artificial intelligence system publicly and accurately predicts a magnitude 7.0 or greater earthquake in the San Francisco Bay Area, with the prediction made at least 24 hours prior to the event. The prediction must specify the earthquake's magnitude (7.0 or higher, does not need to be exact), location (within the San Francisco Bay Area, does not need to be exact), and timing (within a 24-hour window). "There will be a 7+ magnitude earthquake in the SF Bay Area at 2pm June 7 - 2pm June 8, 2031" would be sufficiently specific if it happened then or 24 hours before or after. If the system outputs probabilities, the stated probability must be higher than 50%. Verification will rely on sources such as the United States Geological Survey (USGS), peer-reviewed publications, and reputable news outlets.

Background

Accurate short-term earthquake prediction remains a significant challenge in seismology. While AI and machine learning have been applied to earthquake forecasting, these efforts have primarily focused on probabilistic hazard assessments and early warning systems that provide seconds to minutes of notice. For instance, the ElarmS system successfully provided a brief warning before the 2007 Alum Rock earthquake in California. (en.wikipedia.org) However, no AI system has yet demonstrated the capability to predict large earthquakes with precise timing and location days in advance.

Considerations

The San Francisco Bay Area is seismically active, with a 72% probability of experiencing a magnitude 6.7 or greater earthquake by 2045. (usgs.gov) Despite this, the ability to predict the exact timing and location of such events remains elusive. AI systems have shown promise in analyzing seismic data and identifying patterns, but translating these capabilities into reliable, specific predictions for large earthquakes is an ongoing area of research.

  • Update 2025-06-21 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): The creator has confirmed that for the market to resolve to Yes, if the AI system outputs probabilities, the stated probability for the prediction must be higher than 50%.

  • Update 2025-06-22 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): In response to a question about what qualifies as an AI system, the creator will determine this based on whether the system is described as an AI system in the verification sources

  • Update 2025-06-22 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): To determine what qualifies as an AI system, the creator will consider descriptions from reputable news outlets. This is particularly relevant if other verification sources (e.g., peer-reviewed publications) do not use the 'AI' label for the system.

Get Ṁ1,000 play money
Sort by:

What counts as AI systems? Does it count as AI if most of the work was done by a geophysics model or PDE solver?

@dcxst I'll go off whether or not it's described as an AI system in sufficient quality sources

@IsaacLiu I just updated the sources to include reputable news outlets. Bc deepmind, etc. don't always refer to protein folding, etc solutions as AI in peer-reviewed pubs

say there is a 5.8 and they warn it could be a precursor to a 7+ ?

@JussiVilleHeiskanen if they warn about the 7+ more than 24 hours before the 7+ happens, with sufficient probability attached, that's fine

bought Ṁ10 NO

if this existed it would likely be a probabilistic model right? "predicted with >50% confidence"?

@JoshYou added. Please keep these coming, as I was writing this I realized things were going to get complicated...