This market will resolve based on a vote among the top 25 largest holders by amount spent on the /Joshua/2025-times-person-of-the-year-conso market. I will message them once it resolves and ask them if they liked the resolution, resolves to the majority opinion. If a holder doesn't respond within 72 hours, they'll be skipped and the next highest holder will take their vote. Voters will vote on whether the resolution was good, not whether they liked TIME's pick. If the referenced market never resolves, resolves to a random number generated by @FairlyRandom. Votes will be anonymous.
there will be no ai clarifications added to this market's description
🏅 Top traders
| # | Name | Total profit |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ṁ500 | |
| 2 | Ṁ232 | |
| 3 | Ṁ169 | |
| 4 | Ṁ162 | |
| 5 | Ṁ111 |
As of 12/14 at 8:20am EST the current vote count is 11 YES vs. 2 NO. 12 votes to go: if eligible voters don't reply by December 14 at 2:45pm EST, we will move down the line of holders.
@traders I was having some API troubles fetching the holders, and the way I know how to do it could take me hours. It seems near-certain that people like the resolution, anyone object to resolving YES?
@realDonaldTrump I object.
You promised #random if number of yes/no isn't reached (edit: my memory may be not accurate, please clarify)
Do we have 25 votes? NO
Resolution to be accurate with #FairyRandom
@realDonaldTrump Objection.
You (edit:probably) explicitly promised #FairyRandom if the required number of YES/NO votes was not reached.
Do we have trader's 25 votes? No.
Therefore, the resolution must be conducted using #FairyRandom to remain accurate and fair.
NotTrump, you clearly violated your own resolution criteria (edit: sorry i hadn't made screenshots and may be wrong with that) by resolving the market to one side without the stated conditions being met.
Sorry for that objection
4 votes still to go.
25 hadn’t being reached at the closure time
@1bets that's not what it says. It's only a random number if the 2025 time person of the year market never resolves. It has resolved, so that doesn't count
@NzJack0n maybe I mistake, but that resolution was for 25 voters threshold (as I remember, I see the description now).
Memory is a not ideal thing.
NotTrump, please clarify.
@1bets Does this seem unclear to you? The referenced market is clearly the TIME POTY market.
If the referenced market never resolves, resolves to a random number generated by @FairlyRandom.
