Which interpretation of quantum mechanics will be accepted by 2030
➕
Plus
20
Ṁ3043
2030
2%
Many-worlds interpretation
0.4%
Copenhagen interpretation
0.1%
Many-worlds interpretation (but other worlds are 'not real')
3%
Quantum informational
69%
No consensus
5%
All know quantum phenomena will be described by a new theory.
7%
The Krantz interpretation (fractally consistent modulated clusters)
13%
Other
Resolves to one if it is universally accepted (except a tiny fringe), otherwise is weighted based on something believable as to the current state of thinking, like something published in quanta magazine for example. Close date updated to 2030-01-01 12:00 pm
Get Ṁ1,000 play money
6 Comments
Sort by:
"So I am both dead and alive like Schrödinger's cat?" "You always was" 🔫
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Many-worlds_interpretation#Debate_whether_the_other_worlds_are_real I think it is a philosophical issue as to whether the other worlds are 'real'. Copenhagen requires a "collapse" of the wave function and this doesn't. Disclaimer: I am an armchair follower of this stuff not even studied it as an undergraduate.
wtf happened with loans?
I expect this, but note > otherwise is weighted based on something believable as to the current state of thinking
How it differs from Copenhagen interpretation?
This is the most widely believed one, I think because at least it has a Born rule.

Related questions