Context:
The US Justice Department is investigating crypto predictions-betting platform Polymarket for allegedly accepting trades from US-based users, according to a person familiar with the matter.
The Federal Bureau of Investigation executed a search warrant on Shayne Coplan, Polymarket’s chief executive officer, and seized his phone and electronics, according to the person who asked for anonymity to discuss non-public matters.
Under an agreement with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission reached in 2022, Polymarket is to prevent US-based traders from making transactions on the platform.(Bloomberg)
Resolution:
Resolves YES if there is a consensus of credible reporting that the Department of Justice is no longer actively investigating Polymarket anytime before EOD April 30th.
Resolves YES if the DoJ completes its investigation with no charges, penalties, or any form of punishment, including before Trump's inauguration.
Resolves NO if DoJ completes its investigation and is punished in any form.
Resolves NO if there is no consensus of credible reporting that the investigation is no longer active.
That is, as a default, in the absence of further evidence, this resolves assuming that the investigation is continuing.
However, the bar for evidence that the investigation has been halted will be fairly low.
Reporting saying anything like "Trump tells the DoJ to not bother investigating Polymarket" + no further word that they're investigating would be sufficient for YES.
TL;DR: the DoJ may not publicize all of its activities. But if Trump is exerting pressure to call off the investigation, I expect there will be reporting about that, and I will have a low evidentiary bar to accept that reporting.