What'll be the conclusions of a large study into the ease of learning quantum mechanics with different interpretations?
Plus
3
Ṁ19402027
1D
1W
1M
ALL
48%
"Teach the controversy" makes it harder to learn than any of them
25%
QBism makes it easiest to learn
20%
GRW makes it easiest to learn
20%
De Broglie-Bohm makes it easiest to learn
20%
Retrocausality makes it easiest to learn
20%
Many-worlds makes it easiest to learn
Obviously this market only resolves if such a study is conducted (it should be though!)
The standard for "having learned quantum mechanics" is a place where subjectivity might creep into this. There must be at least some understanding of the Bell inequalities, density matrices, and the Born rule.
Get Ṁ1,000 play money
Sort by:
Why is "teach the controversy" phrased differently than the others?
Why is there the ability for users to add new options? This makes it possible for someone to add new options that eat into the probability of the existing options.
Related questions
Related questions
Retrocausal interpretation of quantum mechanics consensus view by EOY2040?
7% chance
Which approach(es) will lead to a viable theory of quantum gravity?
By the beginning of 2035, will physicists and philosophers mostly agree on the correct interpretation of quantum mechanics?
11% chance
Which interpretation of quantum mechanics will be accepted by 2030
Which interpretation of Quantum Mechanics is closest to the truth?
Will relational quantum mechanics become the consensus view by the end of 2040?
10% chance
Will a theory of everything (a theory that unites relativity and quantum mechanics) be found in physics by 2040?
30% chance
Will a theory of everything (a theory that unites relativity and quantum mechanics) be found in physics by 2040?
46% chance
Will Oppenheim's unified theory of gravity and quantum mechanics pass the test?
31% chance
Rule 30 involved in a computational explanation of quantum mecanics by 2040 ?
12% chance